Twenty-One Days of Review
In the course of a 21-day hearing on the Tesoro-Savage proposal, over 80 witnesses were called to testify on subjects ranging from oil spill risk, train derailments, seismic hazards, emergency response, air emissions, public health impacts, community concerns, tribal fishing and cultural sites, harm to the Columbia River and its fish, insurance, and oil economics. This five-week intense period was in preparation of the review board, called the Energy Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), providing Governor Inslee a recommendation on the terminal.
Two state-wide elected leaders recommended a denial of this terminal during this process.
- The Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Public Lands Commissioner Peter Goldmark, submitted in their initial brief a strongly worded argument on the unreasonable fire and safety risks from the proposed oil terminal and its trains, concluding that the risks were simply too high and “…that the application for site certification for the Proposal be denied.”
- Attorney General Bob Ferguson, in a very rare move in EFSEC adjudications, recommended project denial, saying “Protecting the environment and public safety are top priorities of my office, and we considered the evidence presented with the care those priorities demand. The bottom line is that the potential benefits of this project are dramatically outweighed by the potential risks and costs of a spill.”
On the final afternoon, after the lawyers gave closing arguments, the public had another chance to weigh in. Over a 100 community members gathered to voice their concerns against the proposal at a rally; many then spoke directly to EFSEC. Thank you to all who shared their time and voices to stand up to this dangerous proposal!
A huge thank you to Kristen Boyles and Janette Brimmer of Earthjustice who led the charge in presenting witnesses, pulling together expert testimony, crafting argument, and coordinating allied opponents – the Cities of Vancouver, Spokane, and Washougal, Clark County, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, the Umatilla and Yakama Tribes, the Washington State Counsel for the Environment, ILWU Local 4, Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Fruit Valley Neighborhood Association, Climate Solutions, Stand, Spokane Riverkeeper, Sierra Club, and Washington Environmental Council.
In terms of next steps for the Tesoro-Savage proposal, EFSEC has a lot to review. We expect a recommendation by EFSEC to Governor Inslee sometime in late 2016 / early 2017. We are also waiting for draft air and water permits, which will prompt public comment periods, the final state Environmental Impact Statement, and federal decisions by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Image: Ariane Kunze/The Columbian
Read the coverage of the hearings
If you’re interested in watching some of the hearing, you can go here for daily hearing footage.
The New York Times produced a great piece on the broad implications of oil transportation in Washington.
Oregon Public Broadcasting broke the story that the groundwater in Mosier has been contaminated by the derailment.
The Olympian ran a strong OpEd penned by members of WA’s Physicians for Social Responsibility highlighting the risks the project poses to vulnerable communities.
The Columbian covered one of the most influential voices, the Attorney General’s, weighing in on the proposal.
January Public Hearing on Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Record Comments Submitted on the Tesoro-Savage Proposal!
Mid-January marked the close of comments on the draft environmental impact statement for the proposed Tesoro-Savage oil terminal in Vancouver, WA. The Stand Up To Oil campaign delivered a record-breaking 276,296 comments to Washington’s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) opposing the project. This outpouring of opposition follows turn out of almost 2,000 people to three crowded hearings (two in Vancouver, one in Spokane) in the first weeks of 2016. Read the full press release here >>
The comment period is closed at this time.
Tesoro-Savage would have impacts across the region – from oil spills to accidents along the rail and tanker route. The proposal could also deal a major blow to Vancouver’s economy and quality of life. The project is in direct conflict with a $1.3 billion waterfront redevelopment plan that would build 3,300 new homes, as well as restaurants, shopping and office space. Twenty-two city blocks of the waterfront development would be within 100 feet of the rail line.
Tesoro Savage’s proposal is opposed by the Vancouver City Council, Vancouver Firefighters Union IAFF Local 452, ILWU Local 4, Columbia Waterfront LLC, the Cities of Washougal and Spokane, the Columbia River Inter-tribal Fish Commission, the environmental community, and people from all walks of life across the Northwest.
In The News
Oil Terminal Takeaways | The Columbian | 24 January 2016
Official says Vancouver oil terminal plan deeply flawed | The Columbian | 18 October 2015
Don’t miss our updates & breaking news! Sign up for our email list where you’ll receive news, information, and actions tailor just for you. Sign up here.