Oil and Our NW Waters
Northwest waters face risks of oil spills every day. The huge proposed increase in oil handling would mean a dramatic rise in the risk of oil spills from trains, tankers and barges that could contaminate water and harm wildlife in Northwest rivers, streams and coastlines.
According to analysis by Sightline Institute, new crude oil facilities could result in the following:
Increase in tankers and barges crossing the Salish Sea
Increase in major vessel traffic in Grays Harbor on the Washington Coast
Increase in tank vessels crossing the dangerous bar at the mouth of the Columbia River
Increase in tank vessel traffic in Grays Harbor
Oil train spills that have already contaminated major rivers elsewhere in the U.S. could be a preview of what’s to come in the Northwest. Oil train spills hit record levels in 2014, and in 2013 more oil spilled from trains (1.1 million gallons) into rivers, lakes, and marine waters than in the previous forty years (792,600 gallons).
The fiery oil train derailment in Illinois in February 2015 spilled 630,000 gallons of crude into the Mississippi River. In the wake of the accident, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said the river was in “imminent and substantial danger” of contamination. The 2010 pipeline spill of 843,000 gallons of Canadian tar sands into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan cost more than $1 billon and took years to clean up.
The Northwest is already seeing an increase in tanked oil traffic: barges carried nearly 42 million gallons from ports on the Columbia River to California from January through June 2014. Barges are not held to the same safety standards as tankers.
Typical oil tankers carry about 17 million gallons, while barges can carry more than 6 million gallons. The Northwest has experienced two dozen spills and near misses over the last two decades.
For example in 1988, the Nestucca barge holed off Grays Harbor spilling “only” 231,000 gallons of marine bunker oil, killing an estimated 3,500 seabirds. The surface sheen extended from Oregon to the Strait of Juan DeFuca. A portion of the spill traveled hundreds of miles under the surface and reappeared to befoul beaches at the north end of Vancouver Island in British Columbia.
Each step in the delivery chain increases the chance of oil spills
Photo credit: Paul Anderson
Historically, tankers from Alaska or overseas delivered 90% of crude oil bound for Washington’s refineries. Today, pipeline and rail delivery of crude oil from places like North Dakota and Alberta, Canada accounts for more than 30% of the oil coming into the state.
Some rail oil is delivered directly to the refineries, but increasingly its transit is broken into stages. Sent by train to a facility for short-term storage oil is then loaded onto tankers bound for refineries in the Northwest or outside the region.
If the federal ban on oil exports is lifted on U.S. produced oil, then much more crude could move into and through the region bound for overseas markets. Each added transfer in the delivery chain increases the potential for oil spills.